NEW YORK ASSOCIATION OF CONVENIENCE STORES ET AL.
v.
ROTH, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
NEW YORK ASSOCIATION OF CONVENIENCE STORES ET AL.
ROTH, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
534 U.S. 1056
Supreme Court of the United States (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Winck v. England, 327 F.3d 1296 (11th Cir. 2003)…itary, whether for monetary damages or injunctive relief, which are nonjusticiable across-the-board unless the claim mounts a facial challenge to military regulations. Speigner v. Alexander, 248 F. 3d 1292, 1295 n. 5, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1056, 122 S.Ct. 647, 151 L.Ed.2d 565 (2001); but see id. at 1295 n. 5 (expressly reserving a decision on "the applicability of Mindes to other situations”); Meister, 233 F. 3d at 341 ("[Cjlaims still fall within Mindes ... that are not ‘incident to [a se…