MADDOX
v.
ELZIE ET AL.
MADDOX
ELZIE ET AL.
534 U.S. 836
Supreme Court of the United States (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Grim v. State, 841 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 2003)…rial court should have required special counsel to present mitigation evidence to the penalty phase jury notwithstanding the defendant’s knowledgeable waiver. We disagree on both subissues. In Muhammad v. State, 782 So. 2d 343 (Fla.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 836, 122 S.Ct. 87, 151 L.Ed.2d 49 (2001), and cert. denied, 534 U.S. 944, 122 S.Ct. 323, 151 L.Ed.2d 241 (2001), the defendant Muhammad discharged his penalty phase counsel and did not present any mitigating evidence. In its instructions to the penalty…