STEELE

v.

ORANGE COUNTY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Tahoe-Sierra Pres. Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg'l Planning Agency, 535 U.S. 302 (U.S. 2002)
  …ed the following question: “Whether the Court of Appeals properly determined that a temporary moratorium on land development does not constitute a taking of property requiring compensation under the Takings Clause of the United States Constitution?” 533 U. S. 948-949 (2001). This Court’s Rule 14(l)(a) provides that a “question presented is deemed to comprise every subsidiary question fairly included therein.” The question of how long the moratorium on land development lasted is necessarily subsumed within…

  ← 1 / 4 →
• Rush Prudential Hmo, Inc. v. Moran, 536 U.S. 355 (U.S. 2002)
  …). 230 F. 3d, at 971. Because the decision of the Court of Appeals conflicted with the Fifth Circuit’s treatment of a similar provision of Texas law in Corporate Health Ins., Inc. v. Texas Dept. of Ins., 215 F. 3d 526 (2000), we granted certiorari, 533 U. S. 948 (2001). We now affirm. II To “safeguard] ... the establishment, operation, and administration” of employee benefit plans, ERISA sets “minimum standards ... assuring the equitable character of such plans and their financial soundness,” 29 U. S. C.…