DEWBERRY
v.
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO.; TSU ET UX. V. VOS ET AL.; KEANE V. IBM PENSION PLAN; COLUMBUS-AMERICA DISCOVERY GROUP, INC. V. ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. ET AL.; NEXTWAVE PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; SAAVEDRA, AS SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF HJALMARSSON, DECEASED, ET AL. V. KOREAN AIR LINES CO., LTD.; LITTLES V. UNITED STATES; MATTATALL V. VOSE, DIRECTOR, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; SMALLWOOD V. GIBSON, WARDEN, ET AL.; HEIM V. NEBRASKA ET AL.; SHABAZZ, FKA HURLEY V. NEW YORK; SPERO V. UNITED STATES; BATES V. FLORIDA; MMAHAT V. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION; JOHNSON V. BRAXTON, WARDEN; WILSON V. GEORGIA; PACE V. GEORGIA, IN RE CAGLE, JAMES V. CITY OF ROCK HILL ET AL.; BUCKOM V. O'KONEK; KINERMON V. GARCIA, WARDEN; WILLIAMS V. EPPS; CHANDLER V. DEKALB COUNTY BOARD OF COMMUNITY SERVICES; MINOR V. WETHERINGTON ET AL.; MOORE V. PHELPS DODGE WIRE MAGNET CO.; WILLIAMSON V. DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; SMITH V. CHAPMAN, WARDEN; TOMPKINS V. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; FUSTER-ESCALONA V. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL.; GLAVIS V. GARCIA, WARDEN, ET AL.; SMITH V. BOOKER, SUPERINTENDENT, MISSISSIPPI STATE PENITENTIARY, ET AL.; WALTON ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; CHEN V. MOTOROLA, INC.; CORNELIUS V. RODATUS ET AL.; CLOUD V. COMMUNITY WORKS, INC., ET AL.; SETLIFF V. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; ACEVEDO V. GARRAGHTY, WARDEN; REED V. OHIO; GOODRICH V. FLORIDA ET AL.; BAEZ V. HALL, WARDEN; BILLEMEYER V. NIXON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI, ET AL.; HAWKINS V. PEPSICO, INC., DBA PEPSI-COLA NORTH AMERICA ET AL.; KALLEMBACH V. ZEUSKE ET AL.; DEICHMANN ET AL. V. BOEING CO.; KENDALL V. UNITED STATES; ASHLEY V. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN; VINSON ET AL. V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI; KALLEMBACH V. BECHTOLT, DBA PRESIDENT, VILLAGE OF SOUTH WAYNE, ET AL.; VINSON V. MISSISSIPPI REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL LICENSING BOARD; YUSKO V. TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN ET AL.; POSEY V. GEORGIA BUREAU OF PRISONS ET AL.; TOKAR V. LUEBBERS, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER; THAMMAVONG V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; RICHARD V. VIRGINIA; BOYD V. NORRIS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; SCHEIDLY V. ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE CO., IN RE MUA, STRONG V. ROBINSON, WARDEN; KIRCHNER V. MEYERS, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT ROCKVIEW; DEBLASIO V. UNITED STATES; DAVIS V. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WHITE V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; NOVOSAD V. REPUBLIC BANK FOR SAVINGS, FKA MANHATTAN SAVINGS BANK; ALLEN V. MASSIE, WARDEN; BOATENG V. INTERAMERICAN UNIVERSITY, INC., ET AL.; REED V. BENNETT ET AL.; COTHRUM V. HARGETT, WARDEN; STARKS V. KAPTURE, WARDEN, IN RE SESARIO DEPINEDA, HARRISON V. PINELLAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ET AL.; LEGASPI V. FIRST AMERICA BANK OF ILLINOIS; SCOTT V. JOHNSON, WARDEN, ET AL.; LIMEHOUSE V. RED LOBSTER; ANTHONY V. LOUISIANA; TRAVIS V. OHIO; LUCIOUS V. UNITED STATES; FALKIEWICZ V. CITY OF WESTLAND ET AL.; MOORE V. UNITED STATES; MOORE V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 2000-11-27
Nos. 99-1847; No. 99-1849; No. 99-1891; No. 99-1935; No. 99-1980; No. 99-2054; No. 99-8992; No. 99-9337; No. 99-9445; No. 99-9446; No. 99-9468; No. 99-9476; No. 99-9526; No. 99-9543; No. 99-9562; No. 99-9612; No. 99-9644; No. 99-9668; No. 99-9914; No. 99-9946; No. 99-9975; No. 99-9979; No. 99-10002; No. 99-10004; No. 99-10026; No. 99-10065; No. 99-10067; No. 99-10113; No. 99-10140; No. 99-10146; No. 99-10150; No. 99-10178; No. 99-10209; No. 99-10210; No. 99-10211; No. 99-10214; No. 99-10216; No. 99-10231; No. 99-10235; No. 99-10247; No. 99-10262; No. 00-92; No. 00-114; No. 00-115; No. 00-206; No. 00-267; No. 00-293; No. 00-296; No. 00-308; No. 00-5044; No. 00-5100; No. 00-5103; No. 00-5122; No. 00-5129; No. 00-5134; No. 00-5249; No. 00-5279; No. 00-5295; No. 00-5303; No. 00-5360; No. 00-5368; No. 00-5399; No. 00-5408; No. 00-5423; No. 00-5433; No. 00-5474; No. 00-5491; No. 00-5539; No. 00-5566; No. 00-5580; No. 00-5600; No. 00-5604; No. 00-5622; No. 00-5626; No. 00-5641; No. 00-5648; No. 00-5696; No. 00-5803; No. 00-5994
531 U.S. 1029 Supreme Court of the United States (2000)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This Supreme Court opinion is a summary order disposing of numerous petitions for certiorari and motions filed during the Court's 1999-2000 term, denying relief and declining to review the underlying cases across a wide range of legal matters including criminal justice, employment, insurance, and administrative law. The Court's decision reflects its standard practice of summarily denying certiorari petitions without detailed opinion, effectively affirming or leaving undisturbed the lower court decisions in each case.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

ante, p. 815; ante, p. 815; ante, p. 817; No. 99-1935. No. 99-1980. No. 99-2054. No. 99-8992. No. 99-9337. No. 99-9445. No. 99-9446. No. 99-9468. No. 99-9476. No. 99-9526. No. 99-9543. No. 99-9562. No. 99-9612. No. 99-9644. No. 99-9668. No. 99-9914. No. 99-9946. No. 99-9975. No. 99-9979. No. 99-10002. No. 99-10004. No. 99-10026. No. 99-10065. No. 99-10067. No. 99-10113. No. 99-10140. No. 99-10146. ante, p. 918; ante, p. 924; ante, p. 826; ante, p. 829; 530 U. S. 1221; ante, p. 833; ante, p. 833; 530 U. S. 1280; ante, p. 833; ante, p. 835; ante, p. 836; ante, p. 836; ante, p. 838; ante, p. 839; ante, p. 810; ante, p. 850; ante, p. 852; ante, p. 853; ante, p. 854; ante, p. 855; ante, p. 855; ante, p. 856; ante, p. 858; ante, p. 858; ante, p. 861; ante, p. 863; ante, p. 863; No. 99-10150. No. 99-10178. No. 99-10209. No. 99-10210. No. 99-10211. No. 99-10214. No. 99-10216. No. 99-10231. No. 99-10235. No. 99-10247. No. 99-10262. No. 00-92. No. 00-114. No. 00-115. No. 00-206. No. 00-267. No. 00-293. No. 00-296. No. 00-308. No. 00-5044. No. 00-5100. No. 00-5103. No. 00-5122. No. 00-5129. No. 00-5134. ante, p. 863; ante, p. 865; ante, p. 866; ante, p. 866; ante, p. 866; ante, p. 867; ante, p. 867; ante, p. 868; ante, p. 868; ante, p. 869; ante, p. 870; ante, p. 875; ante, p. 876; ante, p. 877; ante, p. 879; ante, p. 944; ante, p. 929; ante, p. 929; ante, p. 944; ante, p. 883; ante, p. 886; ante, p. 886; ante, p. 887; ante, p. 887; ante, p. 887; No. 00-5249. No. 00-5279. No. 00-5295. No. 00-5303. No. 00-5360. No. 00-5368. No. 00-5399. No. 00-5408. No. 00-5423. No. 00-5433. No. 00-5474. No. 00-5491. No. 00-5539. No. 00-5566. No. 00-5580. No. 00-5600. No. 00-5604. No. 00-5622. No. 00-5626. No. 00-5641. No. 00-5648. No. 00-5696. No. 00-5803. No. 00-5994. ante, p. 894; ante, p. 809; ante, p. 896; ante, p. 897; ante, p. 900; ante, p. 900; ante, p. 902; ante, p. 903; ante, p. 903; ante, p. 904; ante, p. 931; ante, p. 932; ante, p. 933; ante, p. 809; ante, p. 934; ante, p. 910; ante, p. 910; ante, p. 911; ante, p. 934; ante, p. 911; ante, p. 911; ante, p. 912; ante, p. 914; and ante, p. 938. Petitions for rehearing denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw