SHOPPERS FOOD WAREHOUSE MD CORP.
v.
MORENO
SHOPPERS FOOD WAREHOUSE MD CORP.
MORENO
530 U.S. 1270
Supreme Court of the United States (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Anibal S. Mazariegos v. Off. OF THE U.S. Attorney Gen., 241 F.3d 1320 (11th Cir. 2001)…itled to deference so long as it is reasonable. Chevron deference may be applied to agency interpretations arrived at through formed adjudication. See Gonzalez v. Reno, 212 F. 3d 1338, 1348-49 (11th Cir.), reh’g denied, 215 F. 3d 1243, cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1270, 120 S.Ct. 2737, 147 L.Ed.2d 1001 (2000); see also Cardoza.-Fonseca, 480 U.S. at 448, 107 S.Ct. at 1221 ("There is obviously some ambiguity to a term like 'well-founded fear’ which can only be given meaning through a process of case-by-case adjudica…
-
S. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States, 293 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2002)…serve available space for future needs. The absence of statutory language outlining this relationship is a gap in the statutory scheme. “From that gap springs executive discretion.” Gonzalez v. Reno, 212 F. 3d 1338, 1348 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1270, 120 S.Ct. 2737, 147 L.Ed.2d 1001 (2000). Chevron mandates that we defer to a reasonable agency effort to fill the gaps in a given statutory scheme. 467 U.S. at 843-44, 104 S.Ct. 2778. Therefore, we turn to step two of the Chevron test, which requ…