INTER-MODAL RAIL EMPLOYEES ASSN. ET AL.
v.
BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. ET AL.
INTER-MODAL RAIL EMPLOYEES ASSN. ET AL.
BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. ET AL.
530 U.S. 1262
Supreme Court of the United States (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Brunel Hosty, 835 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…pursuant to the disabled adult hearsay exception contained at section 90.803(24). Hosty moved to strike the notice, arguing that section 90.803(24) was facially unconstitutional, in light of Conner v. State, 748 So. 2d 950 (Fla.1999), cert, denied, 530 U.S. 1262, 120 S.Ct. 2719, 147 L.Ed.2d 984 (2000). Following Conner, the circuit court granted the motion to strike and declared section 90.803(24) to be unconstitutional as it applied to disabled adults. Section 90.803 provides, in pertinent part: The prov…