JOHN WESLEY MAYO, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Fam. Bank OF Hallandale, 667 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
  …ights of the assignor, and subject to all the equities and defenses of the debtor connected with or growing out of the obligation that the obligor had against the assignor at the time of the assignment. Dickerson, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., 244 So. 2d 748, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. dismissed, 255 So. 2d 521 (Fla.1971); Guaranty Mortgage & Ins. Co. v. Harris, 182 So. 2d 450, 453 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev’d on other grounds, 193 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1966). Because the fraud was not apparent to the state until Ted’…
• LAW Off. OF David J. Stern, P.A. v. Sec. Nat'l Servicing Corp., 969 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 2007)
  …nected with or growing out of the obligation that the obligor had against the assignor at the time of the assignment. State v. Family Bank of Hallandale, 667 So. 2d 257, 259 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (citing Dickerson, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., 244 So. 2d 748, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971); Guaranty Mortgage & Ins. Co. v. Harris, 182 So. 2d 450, 453 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev’d on other grounds, 193 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1966)); see also Rose v. Teitler, 736 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Whereas the general assignment of…
• Dickerson v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 255 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 1971)
  …against the losses sustained on the Columbia project. FDIC filed suit, issue was joined and the trial court entered judgment in favor of FDIC. This judgment was affirmed on appeal to the District Court of Appeal, First District, opinion reported at 244 So. 2d 748 (1971). Thus, the issue for review is whether Dickerson, as prime contractor, is entitled to setoff against FDIC (Rowell’s ultimate assignee on the Emerson Street project) for its losses sustained on the Columbia project directly attributable to Ro…