SALAZAR-OLIVARES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Wilson v. Barnhart, 284 F.3d 1219 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …. In order for a vocational expert’s testimony to constitute substantial evidence, the ALJ must pose a hypothetical question which comprises all of the claimant’s impairments. See Jones v. Apfel, 190 F. 3d 1224, 1229 (11th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1089, 120 S.Ct. 1723, 146 L.Ed.2d 644 (2000). Here, the ALJ’s finding that Wilson retained the ability to perform the requirements of a range of sedentary work activity is supported by substantial evidence, including the VE’s testimony that a significan…
• Doughty v. Apfel, 245 F.3d 1274 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …fits. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1512(a). The Commissioner uses a five-step process to determine whether a claimant has met the burden of proving his disability. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.920; Jones v. Apfel, 190 F. 3d 1224, 1228 (11th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1089, 120 S.Ct. 1723, 146 L.Ed.2d 644 (2000). In order to receive disability benefits, the claimant must prove at step one that he is not undertaking substantial gainful activity. See id. At step two, the claimant must prove that he is suffering from a…
• Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (U.S. 2003)
  …property of Negroes,” and “pursuing Negroes in automobiles and threatening them with guns”); United States v. Pospisil, 186 F. 3d 1023, 1027 (CA8 1999) (defendants burned a cross in victims’ yard, slashed their tires, and fired guns), cert. denied, 529 U. S. 1089 (2000); United States v. Stewart, 65 F. 3d 918, 922 (CA11 1995) (cross burning precipitated an exchange of gunfire between victim and perpetrators), cert. denied sub nom. Daniel v. United States, 516 U. S. 1134 (1996); United States v. McDermott, 29…