PADILLA-MENA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Niccie McCLENDON v. Ga. Dep't OF Cmty. Health, 261 F.3d 1252 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …g doctrine permits federal courts to entertain suits against state officers seeking prospective equitable relief to end continuing violations of federal law. See Summit Med. Assocs., P.C. v. Pryor, 180 F. 3d 1326, 1336 (11th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1012, 120 S.Ct. 1287, 146 L.Ed.2d 233 (2000) (“Summit Medical"). According to the plaintiffs, the relief they seek is prospective because the defendants will not violate federal law, 42 U.S.C. § 1396k(b), until some time in the future, when Georgia recei…
• Carringer v. Tessmer, 253 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …g does not fit within the collateral order doctrine, and, therefore, that Appellants may not as of right take an immediate interlocutory appeal on this issue.” Summit Med. Assoc., P.C. v. Pryor, 180 F. 3d 1326, 1334-35 (11th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1012, 120 S.Ct. 1287, 146 L.Ed.2d 233 (2000). To grant Carringer the opportunity to appeal its standing decision, the district court was required to issue a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) certification. Hood v. Plantation Gen. Med. Ctr., Ltd., 2…