SANTA FE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
v.
DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR HER MINOR CHILDREN, ET AL.
SANTA FE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR HER MINOR CHILDREN, ET AL.
528 U.S. 1187
Supreme Court of the United States (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ferguson v. City OF Charleston, 532 U.S. 67 (U.S. 2001)…n the privacy of the patients. In dissent, Judge Blake concluded that the “special needs” doctrine should not apply and [*76] that the evidence of consent was insufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict. 186 F. 3d, at 487-488. We granted certiorari, 528 U.S. 1187 (2000), to review the appellate court’s holding on the “special needs” issue. Because we do not reach the question of the sufficiency of the evidence with respect to consent, we necessarily assume for purposes of our decision — as did the Court of A…