HIGH, CLARKE & FENEIS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONER,

v.

PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Thompson v. State, 328 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1976)
  …after the bank robbery.” The defendant agreed and interrogation continued. The Circuit Court of Appeals held that to be a violation of the rights expressed in Miranda, supra. In Wakeman v. State, 237 So. 2d 61 (Fla.App.1970), cert. dism., Fla., 243 So. 2d 419, the Court held that it was a violation of the defendant’s Miranda rights for the police to question her about the crime after she had requested an attorney and while, with the full knowledge of the police, her lawyer was on his way to the jail. Th…
• Walker v. State, 484 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …beyond a reasonable doubt given the overwhelming proof of guilt adduced below. See State v. DiGuilio (Fla.1985) (case no. 65,490, opinion filed August 29, 1985) [10 F.L.W. 430]; State v. Prosser, 235 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970), cert. dismissed, 243 So. 2d 419 (Fla.1971). Third, the defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his oral statements to the police based on Miranda grounds. This contention has given us some pause because it is undisputed that the defendant,…
• Warren v. State, 384 So. 2d 1313 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …ompare, e. g., Breedlove v. State, 364 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Jones v. State, 346 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Webber v. State, 305 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); State v. Prosser, 235 So. 2d 740, 742 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970), cert. dismissed, 243 So. 2d 419 (Fla.1971). And we concur with the statement in United States v. Jones, 486 F. 2d 599, 600 (5th Cir. 1973) that “[djenials of a crime by one well aware of his right to remain silent cannot, without more, be taken as an unspoken election to exercise…

Authorities Cited

• High v. Pub. Serv. Mut. Ins. Co., 238 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)