SULLIVAN

v.

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION

Citator

Cited By

• Johnson v. Booker T. Wash. Broad. Serv., Inc., 234 F.3d 501 (11th Cir. 2000)
  …ually a pretext for prohibited retaliatory conduct.” Sullivan v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., 170 F. 3d 1056, 1059 (11th Cir.1999) (quoting Raney v. Vinson Guard Service, 120 F. 3d 1192, 1196 (11th Cir.1997)) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 966, 120 S.Ct. 402, 145 L.Ed.2d 314 (1999). . The Mendoza opinion discusses “hostile environment,” rather than "quid pro quo" harassment. The Supreme Court in Ellerth largely wiped out the usefulness of the terms “hostile environment” and "quid pro qu…
• Lipphardt v. Durango Steakhouse OF Brandon, Inc., 267 F.3d 1183 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …constituted sexual harassment. Lipphardt was not required to prove that Knuth’s behavior legally constituted harassment in order to recover for retaliation. Sullivan v. National R.R. Passenger Corp., 170 F. 3d 1056, 1058 (11th Cir.), cert. denied 528 U.S. 966, 120 S.Ct. 402, 145 L.Ed.2d 314 (1999) (“[t]he fact that the jury concluded that Sullivan’s claims did not meet all the elements for a successful sexual harassment action does not mean that it could not have found that the incident did take place an…
• Reheiser v. Terminix Int'l Co., 509 F. Supp. 2d 1147 (N.D. Fla. 2007)