IN RE SANDERS

Citator

Cited By

• Christensen v. Harris Cnty., 529 U.S. 576 (U.S. 2000)
  …concluding that the employer could not compel the employee to use compensatory time unless the employee agreed to such an arrangement in advance. Id., [*582] at 247-251. We granted certiorari because the Courts of Appeals are divided on the issue.2 528 U. S. 926 (1999). II Both parties, and the United States as amicus curiae, concede that nothing in the FLSA expressly prohibits a State or subdivision thereof from compelling employees to utilize accrued compensatory time. Petitioners and the United States,…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27 (U.S. 2000)
  …at condition. Ibid. Despite that agreement, we granted the Independent Counsel’s petition for a writ of cer-tiorari in order to determine the precise scope of a grant of immunity with respect to the production of documents in response to a subpoena. 528 U. S. 926 (1999). We now affirm. II It is useful to preface our analysis of the constitutional issue with a restatement of certain propositions that are not in dispute. The term “privilege against self-incrimination” is not an entirely accurate description…
• Pub. Lands Council v. Babbitt, 529 U.S. 728 (U.S. 2000)
  …Secretary’s authority to promulgate the first and the third regulations. See id., at 1309-1318. We granted certiorari to consider the ranchers’ claim that these three regulatory changes exceed the authority that the Taylor Act grants the Secretary. 528 U. S. 926 (1999). II A The ranchers attack the new “grazing preference” regulations first and foremost. Their attack relies upon the [*740] provision in the Taylor Act stating that “grazing privileges recognized and acknowledged shall be adequately safegua…