ROE, WARDEN
v.
FLORES-ORTEGA

U.S. | 1999-10-04
No. 98-1441
528 U.S. 804 Supreme Court of the United States (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Williams, 731 F.3d 1222 (11th Cir. 2013)
    …he Supreme Court’s Rivera analysis. Importantly, neither federal nor state defendants enjoy any right under the Federal Constitution to peremptory challenges. See Rivera, 556 U.S. at 157-58, 129 S.Ct. at 1458-54; United States v. Martinez-Salazar, 528 U.S. 804, 311, 120 S.Ct. 774, 779, 145 L.Ed.2d 792 (2000) (“[UJnlike the right to an impartial jury guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, peremptory challenges are not of federal constitutional dimension.”). Thus, the right that Williams asserts arises only un…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw