VINCENT DELINO AND CAROL DELINO, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
VINCENT DELINO AND CAROL DELINO, APPELLANTS,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
242 So. 2d 468
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Treverrow v. State, Fla.1967, 194 So.2d 250; and Cornelius v. State, Fla.1950, 49 So.2d 332.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hemisphere Equity Realty Co., Inc. v. KEY Biscayne Prop. Taxpayers Ass'n, 369 So. 2d 996 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…, setbacks and accessory uses. “While we agree that there has been no showing of error in the granting of the ‘special exception’ challenged here, see B. S. Enterprises, Inc. v. Dade County, 342 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1977); Ollos v. Dade County, 242 So. 2d 468 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1970); we reach a contrary conclusion concerning the ‘variances’ in question and therefore reverse those portions of the resolution which granted them. We do so simply because as seems to be conceded by everyone, the record shows that…
-
Rilling v. Dade Cnty., 35 Fla. Supp. 100 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1971)…orari is the appropriate remedy to attack zoning resolutions adopted by the respondent’s board of county commissioners, as may be seen from Baker v. Metropolitan Dade County, Fla. App. 1970, 237 So. 2d 201, 202; Ollos v. Dade County, Fla. App. 1970, 242 So. 2d 468, 469, and cases cited in each of the foregoing. Therefore the respondent’s motion to dismiss must be granted because the property owner who obtained zoning relief is an indispensable party as pointed out in Shaughnessy v. Metropolitan Dade County,…
-
Key Biscayne Prop. Taxpayers Ass'n, Inc. v. Dade Cnty., 48 Fla. Supp. 157 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1978)…backs and accessory uses. [*159] While we agree that there has been no showing of error in the granting of the “special exception” challenged here, see B. S. Enterprises, Inc. v. Dade County, 342 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1977); Ollos v. Dade County, 242 So. 2d 468 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1970); we reach a contrary conclusion concerning the “variances” in question and therefore reverse those portions of the resolution which granted them. We do so simply because, as seems to be conceded by everyone, the record shows that…
Authorities Cited
- Westberry v. Daves Auto Parts, 194 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 1967)
- Cornelius v. State, 49 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 1950)