BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, AND SPECIAL TAX SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 3 OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, ET AL.,
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court upheld the Circuit Court's dismissal of a petition to validate joint refunding bonds issued by a school district that was divided between Palm Beach and Martin counties when Martin County was created in 1925. The court held that when the Legislature created Martin County and split the school district, it created two separate districts with several (not joint) obligations to refund their respective portions of the original indebtedness.
The court held that the division of the original school district by creation of Martin County created two separate and distinct districts with several (individual) obligations rather than joint obligations. Each district has the duty to refund its own portion of the bonded indebtedness independently, and the Legislature provided no authority for joint refunding under Chapter 15772, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1931.
“the effect of the enactment of Chapter 10180 supra, was to create or establish as a matter of law two separate and distinct districts of the former Special Tax School District No. 3 of Palm Beach County, and-the agreement to pay the pro rata share of the then existing bonded indebtedness of said district on the part of the two counties was a binding obligation of said counties”
Establishes that the creation of Martin County legally split the school district into two separate entities with binding but individual (several) obligations rather than joint obligations.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSchool District No. 3 of Palm Beach County authorized issuance of $98,000 in bonds before the election was held. In 1925, the Legislature created Mart…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
This case is before the Court on appeal to review an order entered by the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, dismissing a petition to validate refunding bonds of School District No. 3 of Palm Beach and Martin Counties, Florida, in the aggregate sum of $98,000.00. The record shows that since the election authorizing the issuance of the original bonds and prior to the delivery thereof School District No. 3 was located *340wholly in Palm Beach County, Florida. Chapter 10180, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1925, created Martin County, Florida, which took a small portion of territory off the northern part of Palm Beach County and thereby divided Special Tax School District No. 3 so that a portion thereof remained in Palm Beach County and a portion in Martin County. The original bonds were not sold or delivered until after the creation of Martin County.
Section 20 of Chapter 10180, supra, authorized the School Boards of Palm Beach and Martin Counties to adopt an agreement or plan whereby Martin County would assume its pro rata share of the indebtedness of the Board of Public Instruction of Palm Beach County, and by the agreement so reached Palm Beach County assumed sixty-one per cent of the bond issue of Special Tax School District No. 3 and Martin County thirty-nine per cent thereof.
Section 17 of Article XII of the Constitution of Florida authorizes the issuance of bonds on the part of Special Tax School Districts for the exclusive use of the public free schools within such special tax school district, and the levy of a tax on the taxable property of the .district is permitted for the payment of the principal and interest on the bonds. Section 3 of Article VIII of the Constitution of Florida grants the Legislature the power to establish new counties and to change county lines and likewise to make newly established counties liable for their proportion of the then existing indebtedness. The Legislature had the power to enact Chapter 10180, supra. The agreement of the newly established County of Martin with Palm Beach County, through the Boards of Public Instruction, as to the liability of the respective counties as to the bond indebtedness of Special Tax School District No. 3 was a lawful and binding obligation and within the power of each county to enter into.
*341It appears that the effect of the enactment of Chapter 10180 supra, was to create or establish as a matter of law two separate and distinct districts of the former Special Tax School District No. 3 of Palm Beach County, and-the agreement to pay the pro rata share of the then existing bonded indebtedness of said district on the part of the two counties was a binding obligation of said counties when agreed upon in so far as the then existing indebtedness of the former Special Tax School District was concerned, and there was no error on the part of the lower court in entering the order appealed from, thereby holding that the agreement on the part of the two counties created several obligations and the duty rested on each district to refund, if it so desired, its portion of the bonded indebtedness without regard to the other district. Chapter 15772, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1931, makes no provision for refunding bonded indebtedness jointly by the two districts as attempted by the plaintiffs in the lower court. See State v. Halifax Special Road and Bridge District, 126 Fla. 451, 177 So. 302; State v. Board of Public Instruction of Sarasota County, 129 Fla. 235, 176 So. 96.
The order appealed from is affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown, J., concur.
Terrell, C. J., concurs in opinion and judgment.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Bd. of Pub. Instruction of Martin Cnty., 145 Fla. 41 (Fla. 1940)…Terrell, C. J. The record and the briefs in this cause have been carefully examined and the questions raised found to be answered in Board of Public Instruction of Palm Beach County, et al., v. State, 137 Fla. 339, 188 So. 334, so the judgment appealed'from is affirmed on authority of the latter case. Affirmed. Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Chapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. [*42] Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as authorized…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Bd. of Pub. Instruction of Sarasota Cnty., 129 Fla. 235 (Fla. 1937)
- State v. Halifax Special Rd. & Bridge Dist. of Volusia Cnty., 126 Fla. 451 (Fla. 1936)