CROSS

v.

PELICAN BAY STATE PRISON ET AL.; CROSS V. CAMBRA, WARDEN; CROSS V. PELICAN BAY STATE PRISON ET AL.; CROSS V. PELICAN BAY STATE PRISON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Drye v. United States, 528 U.S. 49 (U.S. 1999)
  …tate law determines whether a given set of circumstances creates a right or interest; federal law then dictates whether that right or interest constitutes ‘property’ or the ‘right to property’ under § 6321.” Id., at 898. [*55] We granted certiorari, 526 U. S. 1063 (1999), to resolve a conflict between the Eighth Circuit’s holding and decisions of the Fifth and Ninth Circuits.1 We now affirm. HH Under the relevant provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, to satisfy a tax deficiency, the Government may impose…
• Prunty v. Brooks, 528 U.S. 9 (U.S. 1999)
  …bmits his petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1. Prunty has abused this Court’s certiorari process. On April 19, 1999, we invoked Rule 39.8 to deny Prunty in forma pauperis status with respect to a petition for certio-rari. See Prunty v. Holschuh, 526 U. S. 1063. At that time, Prunty had filed eight petitions for certiorari, all of which were both frivolous and had been denied without recorded dissent. The instant petition for certiorari thus brings Prunty’s total number of frivolous filings to 10. We ente…