NITRAM, INC., ET AL.

v.

M. A. N. GUTEHOFFNUNGSHUTTE GMBH

Citator

Cited By

• Brown v. ITT Consumer Fin. Corp., 211 F.3d 1217 (11th Cir. 2000)
  …the motion to vacate the arbitration award, we accept the district court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, and we review questions of law de novo. Scott v. Prudential Securities, Inc., 141 F. 3d 1007, 1014 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1068, 119 S.Ct. 798, 142 L.Ed.2d 660 (1999). A. Arbitrability of the Dispute Brown challenges the order compelling arbitration on four grounds: (1) that the arbitration clause fails because it is vague; (2) that the arbitration clause is so broad as to…
• Murphy v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 527 U.S. 516 (U.S. 1999)
  …spondent did not terminate petitioner “on an unsubstantiated fear that he would suffer a heart attack or stroke,” but “because his blood pressure exceeded the DOT’S requirements for drivers of commercial vehicles.” Id., at 5a. We granted certiorari, 525 U. S. 1068 (1999), and we now affirm. II The first question presented in this case is whether the determination of petitioner’s disability is made with reference to the mitigating measures he employs. We have answered that question in Sutton in the affirmati…
• Red's Mkt. v. Cape Canaveral Cruise Line, Inc., 2002 WL 77176 (M.D. Fla. 2002)