IN RE BURGESS; IN RE EVERHART; AND IN RE PEREZ BUSTILLO
IN RE BURGESS; IN RE EVERHART; AND IN RE PEREZ BUSTILLO
525 U.S. 999
Supreme Court of the United States (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
O'Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838 (U.S. 1999)…inois Supreme Court to satisfy the exhaustion requirement. Id., at 1199-1202. Thus, according to the Court of Appeals, Boerekel had not procedurally defaulted those claims. Id., at 1202. We granted certiorari to resolve a of Appeals on this issue. 525 U. S. 999 (1998). Compare e.g., Richardson v. Procunier, 762 F. 2d 429 (CA5 1985) (must file petition for discretionary review), with Dolny v. Erickson, 32 F. 3d 381 (CA8 1994) (petition for discretionary review not required), cert. denied, 513 U. S. 1111 (19…