PICKETT
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., ET AL.
PICKETT
WAL-MART STORES, INC., ET AL.
525 U.S. 933
Supreme Court of the United States (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694 (U.S. 2000)…the conditions of supervised [*699] release, which occurred after the 1994 amendments. With no retroactivity, there could be no Ex Post Facto Clause violation. See App. 49 (citing United States v. Abbington, 144 F. 3d 1003, 1005 (CA6), cert. denied, 525 U. S. 933 (1998)). Other Circuits had held to the contrary, that revocation and reimprisonment were punishment for the original offense. From that perspective, application of § 3583(h) was retroactive and at odds with the Ex Post Facto Clause.3 We granted c…