AUBIN
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1998-10-05
No. 98-148
525 U.S. 875 Supreme Court of the United States (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Pedraza v. United Guar. Corp., 313 F.3d 1323 (11th Cir. 2002)
    …that attorneys’ fees were properly bondable under Fed. R.App. P. 7, and in support of this conclusion it cited the holding of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Adsani v. Miller, 139 F. 3d 67, 71-76 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 875, 119 S.Ct. 176, 142 L.Ed.2d 144 (1998). See Baynham v. PMI Mortgage Ins. Co., No. 199-241, slip op. at 6 (S.D.Ga. Oct. 1, 2001) (reasoning that Adsani’s approach to Rule 7 “best comports with the ‘American Rule’ ” that absent exceptional circumstanc…
  • Downey v. Mortg. Guar. Ins. Corp., 313 F.3d 1341 (11th Cir. 2002)
    …that attorneys’ fees were properly bondable under Fed. R.App. P. 7, and in support of this conclusion it cited the holding of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Adsani v. Miller, 139 F. 3d 67, 71-76 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 525 U.S. 875, 119 S.Ct. 176, 142 L.Ed.2d 144 (1998). See Baynham v. PMI Mortgage Ins. Co., No. CIV.199-241, slip op. at 6 (S.D.Ga. Oct. 1, 2001) (reasoning that. Adsani’s approach to Rule 7 “best comports with the ‘American Rule’ ” that absent exceptional cir…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw