IN RE DISBARMENT OF TOTH

Citator

Cited By

• Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp., 527 U.S. 815 (U.S. 1999)
  …d argued specifically that the District Court erred in certifying the class under Rule 23(b)(1)(B) on a “limited fund” theory because the only limited fund in the ease was a creature of the settlement itself. Id., at 671-674. We granted certiorari, 524 U. S. 936 (1998), and now reverse. II The nub of this case is the certification of the class under Rule 23(b)(1)(B) on a limited fund rationale, but before we reach that issue, there are two threshold matters. First, [*831] petitioners eall the class claims…
• Humana Inc. v. Forsyth, 525 U.S. 299 (U.S. 1999)
  …e divided on the question presented: Does a federal law, which proscribes the same conduct as state law, but'provides materially different remedies, “impair” state law under the McCarran-Ferguson Act?6 We granted certiorari to address that question. 524 U. S. 936 (1998). [*306] 1 — 1 Prior to our decision in United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn., 322 U. S. 533 (1944), we had consistently held that the business of insurance was not commerce. See, e. g., Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168, 183 (1869) (…