GENERAL DISTRIBUTOR CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
CURTISS NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI SPRINGS, APPELLEE
GENERAL DISTRIBUTOR CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
CURTISS NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI SPRINGS, APPELLEE
240 So. 2d 321
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
The appellant sued the appellee alleging a conversion of personal property. This appeal is from a final judgment for the defendant. The judgment was entered after a trial before the court sitting without a jury. The only point presented on this appeal is simply that the trial judge made a wrong determination upon the facts. We affirm the judgment upon the rule that where the judgment is reasonably supported by facts in the record, an appellate court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court. Old Equity Life Ins. Co. v. Levenson, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 50.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Land v. State, 293 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 1974)…urt [*707] erred in denying him the right to testify outside of the presence of the jury concerning the voluntariness of the confession given to Sheriff Belser. Allen v. State, 1st D.C.A., 1970, 239 So. 2d 33 and Kitchens v. State, 1st D.C.A., 1970, 240 So. 2d 321.” The trial court concluded, however, that such error did not require the granting of a new trial. In reaching this conclusion, the trial court reasoned: “This Court, however, is of the opinion that the error does not require the granting of a new…1 / 2
-
McDONNELL v. State, 336 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 1976)…d the substantial rights of the appellant. It shall not be presumed that error injuriously affected the substantial rights of the appellant.” . 378 U.S. 368, 12 L.Ed.2d 908, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 1 A.L.R.3d 1205 (1964). . 239 So. 2d 33 (Fla.App.1970). . 240 So. 2d 321 (Fla.App.1970).…
-
Guess v. State, 579 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…hich holds that the failure of the trial court to permit a defendant to testify outside the presence of the jury concerning the volun-tariness of custodial statement is error. Smothers v. State, 513 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Kitchens v. State, 240 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970). On the day of trial, Guess filed a motion to suppress and a motion in limine which were directed toward any statements he may have made while in police custody. The motions were not heard prior to trial. At trial, the state pro…1 / 3
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- OLD Equity Life Ins. Co. v. Franklyn Levenson, 177 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)