PETERSON
v.
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY, LABOR AND HUMAN RELATIONS ET AL.

U.S. | 1998-04-20
No. 97-1467
523 U.S. 1076 Supreme Court of the United States (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techplosion, Inc., 261 F.3d 1188 (11th Cir. 2001)
    …ty under the Commerce Clause rather than an intent to limit the [Lanham] Act’s application to profit making activity.” United We Stand Am., Inc. v. United We Stand, Am. N.Y., Inc., 128 F. 3d 86, 92-93 (2d Cir.1997) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1076, 118 S.Ct. 1521, 140 L.Ed.2d 673 (1998); U.S. Const., Art. I, § 8, cl. 3. Because Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause extends to activity that “substantially affects” interstate commerce, United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 559, 115 S.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw