IN RE ROBINSON; IN RE LONGENETTE; AND IN RE MALONE
IN RE ROBINSON; IN RE LONGENETTE; AND IN RE MALONE
523 U.S. 1071
Supreme Court of the United States (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (U.S. 1999)…ulating the proscriptions of the ordinance.” Id., at 451-452, 687 N. E. 2d, at 60-61. Furthermore, it concluded that the ordinance was “not reasonably susceptible to a limiting construction which would affirm its validity.”15 We granted certiorari, 523 U. S. 1071 (1998), and now affirm. Like the Illinois Supreme Court, we conclude that the ordinance enacted by the city of Chicago is unconstitutionally vague. Ill The basic factual predicate for the city’s ordinance is not in dispute. As the city argues in i…