GERWIG

v.

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; AND SHERMAN V. SHERMAN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Kansas v. Colorado, 533 U.S. 1 (U.S. 2001)
  …s, and that the report improperly recommended the recovery of prejudgment interest on an un-liquidated claim. We overruled those exceptions without prejudice to their renewal after the Special Master made a more specific recommendation for a remedy. 522 U. S. 1073 (1998). He did so in his third report, and we are now confronted with exceptions filed by both States. In the third report, the Special Master recommends that damages be measured by Kansas’ losses, rather than Colorado’s profits, attributable to Co…
• Kansas v. Colorado, 543 U.S. 86 (U.S. 2004)
  …inally awarded. Accordingly, I would sustain Kansas’ second objection to the Special Master’s Report, but only insofar as it applies to post-1968 damages. Kansas III was predated by Kansas v. Colorado, 514 U. S. 673 (1995), and Kansas v. Colorado, 522 U. S. 1073 (1998). Kansas had objected to the Master’s refusal to award interest on all damages accruing after 1950. See Brief for Plaintiff in Kansas III, O. T. 2000, No. 105, Orig., p. 25, n. 8. Although we did not discuss Kansas’ exception to the Special…