MEZA
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MEZA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
522 U.S. 830
Supreme Court of the United States (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Reardon, 763 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)…ich facts the jury found to conclude Mr. Reardon was guilty of the first degree burglary. We must read the verdict in a manner which would give the benefit of the doubt to Mr. Reardon. See Valentine v. State, 688 So. 2d 313 (Fla.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 830, 118 S.Ct. 95, 139 L.Ed.2d 51 (1997); Torna v. State, 742 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Of course, a finding that Mr. Reardon committed the burglary while armed would neither trigger Crawford concerns nor raise the specter of double jeopardy becaus…