WOMEN PRISONERS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL.

v.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Martin Cnty. v. Section 28 P'ship, Ltd., 772 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
  …ents surrounding the developer’s amendment applications is set out in this court’s previous opinion. See Martin County v. Section 28 Partnership, Ltd., 676 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), rev. denied, 686 So. 2d 581 (Fla.1996), cert. de [*618] nied, 520 U.S. 1196, 117 S.Ct. 1553, 137 L.Ed.2d 701 (1997). Stated briefly, the Partnership obtained options on approximately 414 acres of property known as “Section 28” and purchased the remaining 222 acres. The Partnership wanted to develop the 636-acre property, pr…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Buchanan v. Angelone, 522 U.S. 269 (U.S. 1998)
  …ore held that by allowing the jury to consider all relevant mitigating evidence, Virginia’s sentencing procedure satisfied the Eighth [*275] Amendment requirement of individualized sentencing in capital cases. Id., at 347-348. We granted certiorari, 520 U. S. 1196 (1997), and now affirm. Petitioner contends that the trial court violated his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to be free from arbitrary and capricious imposition of the death penalty when it failed to provide the jury with express guidance o…
• Kemner v. Hemphill, 199 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (N.D. Fla. 2002)