ALLIANCE AGAINST IFQS ET AL.
v.
SECRETARY OF COMMERCE ET AL.
ALLIANCE AGAINST IFQS ET AL.
SECRETARY OF COMMERCE ET AL.
520 U.S. 1185
Supreme Court of the United States (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env't, 523 U.S. 83 (U.S. 1998)…and (2) the prevailing party on the merits would be the same as the prevailing party were jurisdiction denied. See, e. g., SEC v. American [*94] Capital Investments, Inc., 98 F. 3d 1133, 1139-1142 (CA9 1996), cert. denied sub nom. Shelton v. Barnes, 520 U. S. 1185 (1997); Smith v. Avino, 91 F. 3d 105, 108 (CA11 1996); Clow v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 948 F. 2d 614, 616, n. 2 (CA9 1991); Cross-Sound Ferry Services, Inc. v. ICC, 934 F. 2d 327, 333 (CADC 1991); United States v. Parcel of Land…
-
Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc., 522 U.S. 422 (U.S. 1998)…fective release by failing to return or offer to return the moneys she had received. The District Court agreed and entered summary judgment for Entergy. The Court of Appeals affirmed, 112 F. 3d 787 (CA5 1996) (per curiam), and we granted certiorari, 520 U. S. 1185 (1997). II The employer rests its case upon general principles of state contract jurisprudence. As the employer recites the rule, contracts tainted by mistake, duress, or even fraud are voidable at the option of the innocent party. See 1 Restateme…