H. J. HEINZ CO. ET AL.
v.
DAYHOFF, INC.
H. J. HEINZ CO. ET AL.
DAYHOFF, INC.
519 U.S. 1028
Supreme Court of the United States (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hetzel v. Prince William Cnty., 523 U.S. 208 (U.S. 1998)…rcuit, that court affirmed the finding of liability, but held that the damages award was grossly excessive because it was unsupported by the limited evidence of harm presented at trial. Hetzel v. County of Prince William, 89 F. 3d 169, cert. denied, 519 U. S. 1028 (1996). The court “set aside the damage award and remand[ed] the case to the district court for the recalculation of the award of damages for emotional distress.” 89 F. 3d, at 173. On remand, the District Court recalculated the damages and awarded…1 / 2