VERA MAE WILLIAMS
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court reversed a robbery conviction for Vera Mae Williams, finding that the trial court should have granted her motion for a new trial along with the principal defendant, George Jones, given the weak evidence and the fact that Williams was less active in the alleged crime.
Yes, the trial court should have granted the motion for a new trial for Vera Mae Williams and Nellie Roberts.
“We feel that the judge was justified in granting the motion for new trial as to the defendant George Jones, but, under the circumstances, we believe that he should have granted the motion, as to the other defendants, who were obviously less active in the assault and robbery, if there was an assault and robbery, than was the defendant George Jones.”
This quote explains the court's reasoning for reversing the conviction, highlighting the disparity in granting a new trial for the principal defendant but not for the co-defendants.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceVera Mae Williams, along with Nellie Roberts and George Jones, was charged with unarmed assault and robbery of J.W. Archer. The State's testimony, tho…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
The County Solicitor of Dade County, Florida, filed an information against the plaintiff in error and two others, Nellie Roberts and George Jones, charging them with having made an unarmed assault upon' one J. W. Archer, and with having robbed, taken- and carried away Thirty-one Dollars and Seventy-five cents, the property of Archer. Subsequently the three defendants were tried in the Criminal Court of Record and found guilty as charged in the information.
The testimony introduced by the State, although unconvincing, indicated that Archer was accosted by the defendant George Jones early in the morning of January 1, 1938, in a dimly lighted street in the city of Miami, and was robbed by Jones with the assistance of the other two defendants, including the plaintiff.in error.
The three defendants were tried jointly, convicted jointly and filed a joint motion for new trial. The court denied the motion as to the plaintiff in error and the defendant Nellie Roberts, and granted it as to the defendant George Jones, who was, according to the State’s testimony, the principal in the alleged crime.
We feel that the judge was justified in granting the motion for new trial as to the defendant George Jones, but, under the circumstances, we believe that he should have granted the motion, as to the other defendants, who were obviously less active in the assault and robbery, if there was an assault and robbery, than was the defendant George Jones. We are of the opinion that justice demands a reversal of the judgment of the lower court. It is so ordered.
Terrell, C. J., -and Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.