GRIMMETT, TRUSTEE FOR THE BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF SIRAGUSA, ET AL.
v.
BROWN ET AL.
GRIMMETT, TRUSTEE FOR THE BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF SIRAGUSA, ET AL.
BROWN ET AL.
519 U.S. 233
Supreme Court of the United States (1997)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 136 L. Ed. 2d 674 · 117 S. Ct. 759 · 1997 U.S. LEXIS 463 · SCDB 1996-016
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari in this case is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Klehr et ux. v. A. O. Smith Corp., 521 U.S. 179 (U.S. 1997)…hkin, Gaims, Gaines & Jonas, 913 F. 2d 817, 820 (CA10 1990). Other Circuits have applied forms of an “injury discovery” rule, i. e., without the “pattern.” See Grimmett v. Brown, 75 F. 3d 506, 511 (CA9 1996), cert. dism’d as improvidently granted, 519 U. S. 233 (1997); McCool v. Strata Oil Co., 972 F. 2d 1452, 1464-1465 (CA7 1992); Rodriguez v. Banco Central Corp., 917 [*186] F. 2d 664, 665-666 (CA1 1990); Bankers Trust Co. v. Rhoades, 859 F. 2d 1096, 1102 (CA2 1988), cert. denied, 490 U. S. 1007 (1989); P…1 / 2
-
United States v. Green, 873 F.3d 846 (11th Cir. 2017)…ases in support of his argument that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to redact the indictment’s references to Defendant’s previous “crimes.” Defendant first points to Old Chief v. United States, 619 U.S. 172, 174, 117 S.Ct. 644, 136 L.Ed.2d 674 (1997), which, in the context of a trial on a § 922(g) prosecution, addressed the question “whether a district court.abuses its discretion if it ,., admits the full record of a prior judgment,, when the name or nature of the prior offense raises the…