SSC CORP.
v.
TOWN OF SMITHTOWN ET AL.; JENKINS V. NEW MEXICO SECURITIES DIVISION; BUSH V. JONES ET AL.; BROIDA V. SMITH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF HOROWITZ, DECEASED, ET AL.; MORATA V. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; SIMONE ET UX. V. WORCESTER COUNTY INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS; ANDERSON V. UNITED STATES; BOLT V. SINGLETON ET AL.; BRAKE V. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT; STANO V. SINGLETARY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MCCORMICK V. KAYLO, WARDEN; FROMAL V. JACKSON; VERDUGO V. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY AT LOS ANGELES ET AL.; YOUNG V. CITY OF CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA, ET AL.; MENDOZA-FIGUEROA V. UNITED STATES; CROWE V. GEORGIA; WYNN V. AC ROCHESTER, DIVISION OF GENERAL MOTORS CORP.; MARIAN V. CALLES ET AL.; LAW V. LAW; ARVIN-THORNTON V. PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS, INC.; MELKONIAN ET AL. V. TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE ET AL.; KNIGHT V. COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA; SWEENEY V. UNITED STATES; ORNELAS V. MYERS, WARDEN, ET AL.; GALLEGO-SANCHEZ V. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; FELKER V. THOMAS, WARDEN; TOKHTAMESHEV V. AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN CO., IN RE MCQUEEN, PRINGLE V. UNITED STATES, IN RE MARTINEZ, NANCE V. UNITED STATES, EICKLEBERRY V. UNITED STATES; TYLER V. BOWERSOX, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER; ENGELKING V. UNITED STATES; WARD V. TURNER; CURIALE V. SEDWICK, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA; DREAD V. MARYLAND STATE POLICE, IN RE ROBINSON, FLEMMINGS V. MORTON ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This Supreme Court order denied petitions for rehearing in thirty-nine cases spanning diverse legal matters, including administrative law, criminal procedure, constitutional disputes, and tort litigation. The Court's denial of rehearing requests meant that its previous decisions in these cases became final, leaving the lower court rulings intact across multiple jurisdictions and subject areas.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
516 U. S. 1112; 516 U. S. 1074; 516 U. S. 1113; No. 95-914. No. 95-1005. No. 95-1066. No. 95-1091. No. 95-1120. No. 95-1149. No. 95-6851. No. 95-7024. No. 95-7033. No. 95-7037. No. 95-7047. No. 95-7055. No. 95-7065. No. 95-7096. No. 95-7101. No. 95-7102. No. 95-7121. No. 95-7144. No. 95-7187. No. 95-7192. No. 95-7210. No. 95-7271. No. 95-7287. No. 95-7298. No. 95-7365. 516 U. S. 1141; 516 U. S. 1117; 516 U. S. 1159; 516 U. S. 1119; 516 U. S. 1147; 516 U. S. 1147; 516 U. S. 1122;
516 U. S. 1125; 516 U. S. 1148; 516 U. S. 1125;
516 U. S. 1132; 516 U. S. 1133; 516 U. S. 1149; 516 U. S. 1157; No. 95-7380. No. 95-7388. No. 95-7402. No. 95-7470. No. 95-7489. No. 95-7567. No. 95-7611. No. 95-7624. No. 95-7631. No. 95-7788. No. 95-7813. 516 U. S. 1135; 516 U. S. 1145; 516 U. S. 1136; 516 U. S. 1138; 516 U. S. 1149; 516 U. S. 1150; 516 U. S. 1151; 516 U. S. 1163; 516 U. S. 1163; 516 U. S. 1157; and 516 U. S. 1166. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Frazier v. State, 761 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…t. denied, 517 U.S. 1190, 116 S.Ct. 1679, 134 L.Ed.2d 781 (1996). Because our reversal was based in part on a jury instruction issue raised in Jones v. State, 656 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 663 So. 2d 632 (Fla.1995), and cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1150, 116 S.Ct. 1451, 134 L.Ed.2d 570 (1996), for which review was being sought in the supreme court, we initially issued a stay of our mandate but ultimately issued the mandate on November 27, 1995. The state filed a motion to stay the trial court proce…
Authorities Cited (48 total)
- Shulze v. United States, 516 U.S. 1122 (U.S. 1996)
- Gamble v. Florida, 516 U.S. 1122 (U.S. 1996)
- Friend v. United States, 516 U.S. 1157 (U.S. 1996)
- Duncan v. Louisiana, 516 U.S. 1148 (U.S. 1996)
- Loken v. Century 21-Award Props., 516 U.S. 1113 (U.S. 1996)
- Williams v. United States, 516 U.S. 1119 (U.S. 1996)
- In re Holcomb, 516 U.S. 1145 (U.S. 1996)
- Lundis v. United States, 516 U.S. 1148 (U.S. 1996)
- Hill v. United States, 516 U.S. 1133 (U.S. 1996)
- Sofamor Danek Grp., Inc. v. Gaus, 516 U.S. 1112 (U.S. 1996)