SMILEY
v.
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N. A.
SMILEY
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N. A.
517 U.S. 1118
Supreme Court of the United States (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gen. Motors Corp. v. Tracy, 519 U.S. 278 (U.S. 1997)…MC’s equal protection claim as “submerged in its Commerce Clause argument.” Id., at 81-32, 652 N. E. 2d, at 190. We granted GMC’s petition for certiorari to address the question of standing as well as the Commerce and Equal Protection Clause issues. 517 U. S. 1118 (1996). II The Supreme Court of Ohio held GMC to be without standing to raise this Commerce Clause challenge because the company is not one of the sellers said to suffer discrimination under the challenged tax laws. But cognizable injury from unco…
-
Lopez v. Monterey Cnty., 525 U.S. 266 (U.S. 1999)…hat appellants had challenged in their original complaint. This Court granted appellants’ emergency stay application and enjoined the proposed, eountywide election. 516 U. S. 1104 (1996). We subsequently noted probable jurisdiction over the appeal, 517 U. S. 1118 (1996), and we reversed, Lopez v. Monterey County, 519 U. S. 9 (1996). The District Court had erred, we concluded, in directing an election to take place under a scheme that had not been precleared as required under §5. Accordingly, we remanded the…
-
Lopez v. Monterey Cnty., 519 U.S. 9 (U.S. 1996)…as unprecleared. On January 22, 1996, appellants filed an emergency application in this Court to enjoin the 1996 elections pending appeal. We granted the application on February 1, 516 U. S. 1104 (1996), and noted probable jurisdiction on April 1, 517 U. S. 1118 (1996). a > Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act applies whenever a covered jurisdiction “enact[s] or seek[s] to administer any . . . standard, practice, or procedure” different from that in force on the date of § 5 coverage. As a threshold matter,…