IN RE BEARDEN; IN RE GLASS; AND IN RE RAITPORT

Citator

Cited By

• Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343 (U.S. 1996)
  …it of certiorari. 511 U. S. 1066 (1994). Several months later, the Ninth Circuit affirmed both the finding of a Bounds violation and, with minor exceptions not important here, the terms of the injunction. 48 F. 3d 1261 (1994). We granted certiorari, 514 U. S. 1126 (1995). II Although petitioners present only one question for review, namely, whether the District Court’s order “exceeds the constitutional requirements set forth in Bounds,” Brief for Petitioners (i), they raise several distinct challenges, incl…
• Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Calhoun, 516 U.S. 199 (U.S. 1996)
  …rties to brief a preliminary question: “Under 28 U. S. C. § 1292(b), can the courts of appeals exercise jurisdiction over any question that is included within the order that contains the controlling question of law identified by the district court?” 514 U. S. 1126 (1995). The answer to that question, we are satisfied, is yes. Section 1292(b) provides, in pertinent part: “When a district judge, in making in a civil action an order not otherwise appealable under this section, shall be of the opinion that such…
• Peacock v. Thomas, 516 U.S. 349 (U.S. 1996)
  …istrict Court properly exercised ancillary jurisdiction over Thomas’ suit. 39 F. 3d 493 (CA4 1994). We granted certiorari to determine whether the District Court had subject-matter jurisdiction and to resolve a conflict among the Courts of Appeals.2 514 U. S. 1126 (1995). We now reverse. II Thomas relies on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 88 Stat. 832, as amended, 29 [*353] U. S. C. § 1001 et seq., as the source of federal jurisdiction for this suit. The District Court did not…