KYLES
v.
UNITED STATES; AND KYLES V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1995-03-27
Nos. 94-8238; No. 94-8243
514 U.S. 1044 Supreme Court of the United States (1995) Caution
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Eules Mayes, 158 F.3d 1215 (11th Cir. 1998)
    …disciplinary sanctions do not bar subsequent criminal prosecutions on double jeopardy grounds. See United States v. Cordova, 414 F. 2d 277, 277 (5th Cir.1969); Garrity v. Fiedler, 41 F. 3d 1150, 1152 (7th Cir.1994) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1044, 115 S.Ct. 1420, 131 L.Ed.2d 303 (1995). After Halper, however, the issue arose whether prison disciplinary sanctions might ever be considered sufficiently excessive to constitute criminal punishment for double jeopardy purposes. Every circuit cou…
    1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw