ESTATE OF RAVETTI

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Griffin v. State, 866 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2003)
  …his trial1 and four issues relating to the penalty phase.2 This Court affirmed both the convictions and the sentence of death. Griffin, 639 So. 2d at 972. The United States Supreme Court denied Griffin’s petition for certiorari. Griffin v. Florida, 514 U.S. 1005, 115 S.Ct. 1317, 131 L.Ed.2d 198 (1995). Thereafter, Griffin filed a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, raising thirty-one claims of error. The circuit court held a Huff hearing and subsequently…
• Coolen v. State, 696 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 1997)
  …and inseparable part of the act which is in [*743] issue.... [I]t is necessary to admit the evidence to adequately describe the deed.” 639 So. 2d 966, 968 (Fla.1994) (quoting Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 404.17 (1993 ed.)), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1005, 115 S.Ct. 1317, 131 L.Ed.2d 198 (1995). In the instant case, Jamie Caughman’s testimony does not fall within the Williams rule and was not introduced by the State as similar fact evidence. Nor was this testimony’s sole relevance to prove Coolen’s…
• Smith v. State, 866 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 2004)
  …elevant and inseparable part of the act which is in issue.... [I]t is necessary to admit the evidence to adequately describe the deed.” 639 So. 2d 966, 968 (Fla.1994) (quoting Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 404.17 (1993 ed.)), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1005, 115 S.Ct. 1317, 131 L.Ed.2d 198 (1995). In the instant case, Jamie Caugh-man’s testimony does not fall within the Williams rule and was not introduced by the State as similar fact evidence. Nor was this testimony’s sole relevance to prove Coolen’…