COMMERCE NATIONAL BANK IN LAKE WORTH, A NATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

ITT FEDERAL LABORATORIES, A DIVISION OF INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Litman v. Fine, 517 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …withdrawal or discharge of the attorney before litigation is ended does not deprive him of his right to enforce a claim of lien asserted before the close of the litigation, de La Cruz v. Brown, 338 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Ryder v. MacKenzie, 235 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).…
• Crawford Door Sales Co. & Am. Home Assurance Co. v. Braun, 357 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …ithdrawn the offer nor set a time limit for its acceptance. We hold that the parties’ parol agreement was properly before the court and promptly made a part of the record in full compliance with the mandate of Rule 1.030(d). See Ryder v. MacKenzie, 235 So. 2d 36 (Fla.3d DCA 1970). But cf. Arnold v. Arnold, 292 So. 2d 384 (Fla.3d DCA 1974) and O’Neal v. McElhiney, 172 So. 2d 492 (1st DCA 1965) (agreement not before the court or promptly incorporated in the record). Appellants’ next argument, that under ordi…
• Ryder v. MacKENZIE, 239 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 1970)
  …Certiorari denied. 235 So. 2d 36. ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

• Correria v. The Orlando Bank & Tr. Co. & William C. Hooker, Jr., 235 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)
• Auto Recovery Serv., Inc. v. Mercantile Nat'l Bank OF Miami Beach, 161 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)