IN RE CONSTANT

Citator

Cited By

• Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (U.S. 1996)
  …to serve compelling interests, but the trial court found none sufficient. It enjoined enforcement of Amendment 2, and the Supreme Court of Colorado, in a second opinion, affirmed the ruling. 882 P. 2d 1335 (1994) (Evans II). We granted certiorari, 513 U. S. 1146 (1995), and now affirm the judgment, but on a rationale different from that adopted by the State Supreme Court. II The State’s principal argument in defense of Amendment 2 is that it puts gays and lesbians in the same position as all other persons…
• Gabe Kaimowitz v. Orlando, 122 F.3d 41 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …of a preliminary injunction, the reviewing court will go no further into the merits than is necessary to decide the interlocutory appeal”). . Mitsubishi Int'l Corp. v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc., 14 F. 3d 1507, 1517 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1146, 115 S.Ct. 1092, 130 L.Ed.2d 1061 (1995); see also Cafe 207, Inc. v. St. Johns County, 989 F. 2d 1136, 1137 (11th Cir.1993) (noting that preliminary injunction is a "drastic remedy”). . De Beers Consol. Mines v. U.S., 325 U.S. 212, 220, 65 S.Ct. 1…