UNITED STATES

v.

GAUDIN

Citator

Cited By

• Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (U.S. 1996)
  …ate. Finding that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, the Eleventh Circuit remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss petitioner’s suit.4 Petitioner sought our review of the Eleventh Circuit’s decision,5 and we granted certiorari, 513 U. S. 1125 (1995), in order to consider two questions: (1) Does the Eleventh Amendment prevent Congress from authorizing suits by Indian tribes against States for prospective injunctive relief to enforce legislation enacted pursuant to the Indian Commerce Clau…
• BMW of N. Am., Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559 (U.S. 1996)
  …believed that a review of this case would help to illuminate “the character of the standard that will identify unconstitutionally excessive awards” of punitive damages, see Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg, 512 U. S. 415, 420 (1994), we granted certiorari, 513 U. S. 1125 (1995). II Punitive damages may properly be imposed to further a State’s legitimate interests in punishing unlawful conduct and deterring its repetition. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U. S. 323, 350 (1974); Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc., 453 U…
• Morse v. Republican Party of Virginia, 517 U.S. 186 (U.S. 1996)
  …to a national convention. See 409 U. S. 809 (1972). Its dismissal of the § 10 claim rested on its view that only the Attorney General has authority to enforce that section of the Act. 853 F. Supp., at 215-217. [*193] We noted probable jurisdiction, 513 U. S. 1125 (1995), and now reverse. II In the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Congress enacted a complex scheme of remedies for racial discrimination in voting that were to be applied in areas where such discrimination had been most flagrant. Section 4 of the Ac…