RIDGEWAY ET AL.
v.
PFIZER, INC., ET AL.

U.S. | 1995-01-09
No. 94-843
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
513 U.S. 1103 Supreme Court of the United States (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • S. Card & Novelty, Inc. v. Lawson Mardon Label, 138 F.3d 869 (11th Cir. 1998)
    …Sales, Inc. v. Hollymatic Corp., 28 F. 3d 1379, 1383 (5th Cir.1994) (“Ties that constrain only dealers ... create relatively little danger to competition, provided consumers may purchase the two goods separately.”) (footnote omitted), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1103, 115 S.Ct. 779,130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995); Ransomes Am. Corp. v. Spartan Distribs., Inc., 914 F.Supp. 183, 185 (W.D.Mich.1996) (“Tying arrangements that constrain only dealers are not presumptively illegal because they pose little danger to competition…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw