ROBINSON
v.
TEXAS; MADSEN ET AL. V. WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER, INC., ET AL.; CHANDLER V. UNITED STATES; FEDERACION DE MAESTROS DE PUERTO RICO V. PUERTO RICO LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; ADAMS V. UNITED STATES; MARAVILLA ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; GILDER V. AETNA LIFE & CASUALTY; KILPATRICK V. STATE BAR OF TEXAS; TWEEDY V. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.; CASILLAN ET AL. V. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT ET AL.; SHAW V. UNITED STATES; INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA ET AL. V. MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC.; ROOD V. PINELLAS COUNTY ET AL.; ROSENBAUM V. ROSENBAUM ET AL.; MESSA V. FOLEY, SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.; REED V. FARLEY, SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE PRISON, ET AL.; JOHNSON V. ILLINOIS; WICKLIFFE V. FARLEY, WARDEN, ET AL.; MCCOLLUM V. NORTH CAROLINA; BACIGALUPO V. CALIFORNIA; MONTIEL V. CALIFORNIA; BUCHANAN V. UNITED STATES; DUVALL V. ADMINISTRATOR, EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE, ET AL.; HOPKINS V. UNITED STATES; DARDEN-BEY ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; TURNER V. LUMADUE; JACKSON V. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; GAYDOS V. NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE CO. ET AL.; FREEMAN V. UNITED STATES; IN RE MCCURDY; JACKSON V. MAKEL, WARDEN; IN RE JACKSON; PONCE-BRAN V. CALIFORNIA FACULTY ASSN. ET AL.; JONES V. WASHINGTON, WARDEN; RESNOVER V. CARTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA, ET AL.; ARDITI V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL; DEVITTO V. SINGLETARY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; COOPER ET AL. V. MISSOURI BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE ET AL.; MERIT V. UNITED STATES; WATTS V. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (TWO CASES); BUHL V. UNITED STATES; ROMANO V. UNITED STATES; IN RE ANDERSEN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This is a Supreme Court order disposing of petitions for rehearing in thirty-five cases decided during the 1993 term, denying rehearing in all matters and affirming the Court's earlier decisions across diverse areas of law including criminal procedure, administrative law, and civil disputes.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
ante, p. 1246; ante, p. 753; ante, p. 1227; 511 U. S. 1069; ante, p. 1204; ante, p. 1219; ante, p. 1221; ante, p. 1236; ante, p. 1236; ante, p. 1221; ante, p. 1222; ante, p. 1245; ante, p. 1237; ante, p. 1222; ante, p. 1238; ante, p. 339; ante, p. 1227; 510 U. S. 1124; No. 93-7200. No. 93-7631. No. 93-7680. No. 93-7724. No. 93-8220. No. 93-8423. No. 93-8442. No. 93-8478. No. 93-8485. No. 93-8490. No. 93-8869. No. 93-8893. No. 93-8924. No. 93-8925. No. 93-8970. No. 93-8975. No. 93-9025. No. 93-9040. No. 93-9041. No. 93-9042. No. 93-9120. No. 93-9162. No. 93-9255. No. 93-9365. No. 93-9433. ante, p. 1254; ante, p. 1253; ante, p. 1253; ante, p. 1228; 511 U. S. 1074; ante, p. 1229; ante, p. 1223; ante, p. 1239; 511 U. S. 1144; ante, p. 1239; 511 U. S. 1134; ante, p. 1234; ante, p. 1224; ante, p. 1218; ante, p. 1241; ante, p. 1241; ante, p. 1246; ante, p. 1224; ante, p. 1225; ante, p. 1225; ante, p. 1212; ante, p. 1242; ante, p. 1243; ante, p. 1245; and ante, p. 1234. Petitions for rehearing denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Pereira-Poso v. United States, 510 U.S. 1124 (U.S. 1994)
- Dean v. Maryland, 510 U.S. 1124 (U.S. 1994)
- Mojica v. Gannett Co., Inc., 511 U.S. 1069 (U.S. 1994)
- Bianco v. United States, 511 U.S. 1069 (U.S. 1994)
- Wilson v. Lanham, 511 U.S. 1074 (U.S. 1994)
- Duvall v. Adm'r, E. Pa. Psychiatric Inst., 511 U.S. 1074 (U.S. 1994)
- McFail v. United States, 511 U.S. 1134 (U.S. 1994)
- Richmond v. United States, 511 U.S. 1134 (U.S. 1994)
- Lupe v. United States, 511 U.S. 1144 (U.S. 1994)
- Singleton v. Carmichael, 511 U.S. 1144 (U.S. 1994)