THOMAS EARL WATSON, A/K/A "TOM", APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
THOMAS EARL WATSON, A/K/A "TOM", APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
233 So. 2d 440
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no harmful error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.
Affirmed.
McCAIN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ellis v. Golconda Corp., 352 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)…lve was thus a concurring cause of the injury. McKenzie is liable for damages which are partly the result of other causes if the other cause alone would not have been sufficient to produce the injury. Hamilton v. Walker Chemical & Exterminating Co., 233 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970). This additional evidence in my opinion was sufficient for a jury to determine the appropriateness of an award of punitive damages. . Recently, however, our court seems to have adopted an exception to the majority rule. In Alexa…
-
The Second Nat'l Bank of N. Miami v. Hannan S. Constr. Inc., 260 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)…egraph Company v. Redding, 100 Fla. 495, 129 So. [*534] 743; Jones v. Central National Bank and Trust Company, 110 Fla. 262, 148 So. 765: Cooley v. Rahilly, Fla.App.1967, 200 So. 2d 258; Hamilton v. Walker Chemical & Exterminating Co., Fla.App.1970, 233 So. 2d 440.…
-
Kris Miles & Babette Miles v. AAA Ins. Co., 771 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…rived of the use of the insured residence through the negligence of AAA, and they are entitled to claim the full amount of damages which were arguably proximately caused by that negligence. We agree. See Hamilton v. Walker Chem. & Exterminating Co., 233 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970). Reversed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.…