LEE HARVE F. YOUNG, HOMER SHELLNUT, LESTER NEIL DEESE, AND JOHNYE CURTIS, APPELLANTS,
v.
WAKULLA COUNTY BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, APPELLEE
LEE HARVE F. YOUNG, HOMER SHELLNUT, LESTER NEIL DEESE, AND JOHNYE CURTIS, APPELLANTS,
WAKULLA COUNTY BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, APPELLEE
233 So. 2d 434
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1970)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.
CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Filmon v. State, 336 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 1976)…dering the question under Section [*594] 322.261, before Mitchell was decided, unanimously held that a lawful arrest was a necessary antecedent to a blood test because otherwise the statute “would probably be heid unconstitutional.” Shores v. State, 233 So. 2d 434, 436 (Fla.App.1st, 1970); Mitchell v. State, 227 So. 2d 728 (Fla.App.2nd, 1969). I am compelled to dissent in the present case, however, not on the basis of Fla.Stat. § 322.261 (1975), but for the reason that the unwarranted taking of appellant’s bl…
-
McKISSACK v. State, 243 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)…t evidence to sustain the finding of the judge, sitting as the finder of the facts, that the error, if any, was “harmless.” See generally: State v. Coffey, Fla.1968, 212 So. 2d 632; § 59.041, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; but cf. Shores v. State, Fla.App.1970, 233 So. 2d 434. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment and sentence appealed from are affirmed. Affirmed.…