MR. SPROUT, INC., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
MR. SPROUT, INC., ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
512 U.S. 1205
Supreme Court of the United States (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Holifield v. Reno, 115 F.3d 1555 (11th Cir. 1997)…endant intentionally discriminated against the plaintiff. St. Mary’s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502, 511, 113 S.Ct. 2742, 2749, 125 L.Ed.2d 407, 422 (1993). See Pignato v. American Trans Air, Inc., 14 F. 3d 342, 346-47 (7th Cir.); cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1205, 114 S.Ct. 2675, 129 L.Ed.2d 810 (1994). Put another way, once the employer succeeds in carrying its intermediate burden of production, the ultimate issue in the case becomes whether the plaintiff has proven that the employer intentionally discrim…