HARRILL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. DOE, 519 U.S. 425 (U.S. 1997)
  …wa, 682 F. 2d 1344, 1350 (1982)). The court relied on one case holding that Congress had abrogated the University’s immunity from suit for patent infringement, Genentech, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 998 F. 2d 931, 940-941 (CA Fed. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U. S. 1140 (1994), and another holding that the University had waived its immunity in some eases, In re Holoholo, 512 F. Supp. 889, 901-902 (Haw. 1981), for its conclusion that the “University is an enormous entity which functions in various capacities and whi…
• Ragsdale v. Rubbermaid, Inc., 193 F.3d 1235 (11th Cir. 1999)
  …erived from the Latin phrase "qui tam pro domingo rege quam pro se imposo sequitur” meaning "who brings the action as well for the king as for himself.” United States ex rel. Kelly v. Boeing Co., 9 F. 3d 743, 746 n. 3 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1140, 114 S.Ct. 1125, 127 L.Ed.2d 433 (1994). . Although Miller was the original plaintiff in this case, his trustee in bankruptcy was substituted as plaintiff by district court order dated November 17, 1997. . One month before he was terminated, Mille…
• Crosby v. Hosp. Auth. OF Valdosta & Lowndes Cnty., 93 F.3d 1515 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …state action immunity. See City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, 499 U.S. 365, 374-75, 379, 111 S.Ct. 1344, 1351, 1353, 113 L.Ed.2d 382 (1991). See also Genentech, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co., 998 F. 2d 931, 948 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1140, 114 S.Ct. 1126, 127 L.Ed.2d 434 (1994). . State action immunity remained an issue in the case as to one of the hospital defendants who had presented a new state-action argument in its brief on rehearing en banc. Bolt III, 891 F. 2d at 818 n. 12, 82…