BIENVENIDO LOPETIGUI, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the evidence was sufficient and no reversible error occurred.
Appellant was found guilty by a jury of unlawful possession and sale of a narcotic drug. This appeal followed the judgment and sentence.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unlawful Possession Of A Narcotic Drug cases and more on FLexlaw
A jury found the appellant guilty of (1) unlawful possession of a narcotic drug, and (2) unlawful sale of a narcotic drug. This appeal is from the judgment of guilty and the sentence of ten years in prison. We affirm.
Four of appellant’s eight assignments of error are devoted to rulings upon the sufficiency of the evidence. Our reading of the record convinces us that the evidence was not only sufficient but was overwhelming in support of the jury’s verdict.
The remaining assignments are directed to rulings upon the admissibility of evidence and the denial of a motion for mistrial. None of the assignments argued present reversible error.
*400Appellant has attempted to present a point directed to the denial of his motion to suppress the physical evidence seized at the time of his arrest. This point is not supported by an assignment of error. In addition the record does not contain a motion to suppress the evidence upon the same ground as that alleged on appeal.
No error appears. The judgment and sentence are affirmed.
Affirmed.