TORO
v.
UNITED STATES; LIPSCOMB V. UNITED STATES; COPPOCK V. UNITED STATES; HARVEY V. UNITED STATES; TETERS V. UNITED STATES; PERRY V. UNITED STATES; AND PROCTOR V. UNITED STATES
TORO
UNITED STATES; LIPSCOMB V. UNITED STATES; COPPOCK V. UNITED STATES; HARVEY V. UNITED STATES; TETERS V. UNITED STATES; PERRY V. UNITED STATES; AND PROCTOR V. UNITED STATES
510 U.S. 1091
Supreme Court of the United States (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
THE Pub. Health Tr. OF Dade Cnty. v. Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd., 693 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…. of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., Div. of Social & Economic Servs., 371 So. 2d 190, 192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). This finding is consistent with cases from other jurisdictions. In Evanston Hospital v. Hauck, 1 F. 3d 540 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1091, 114 S.Ct. 921, 127 L.Ed.2d 215 (1994), Mr. Hauck was involved in an accident and as a result, was a patient at Evanston Hospital for more than a year. Evanston Hospital accepted reimbursement from Medicaid for medical services rendered on behalf of…