MCMANUS ET AL.
v.
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD ET AL.; FEE V. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION; COKER V. GEORGIA ET AL.; COKER V. GEORGIA ET AL.
MCMANUS ET AL.
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD ET AL.; FEE V. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION; COKER V. GEORGIA ET AL.; COKER V. GEORGIA ET AL.
510 U.S. 1009
Supreme Court of the United States (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stansbury v. California, 511 U.S. 318 (U.S. 1994)
-
Associated Indus. of Mo. v. Lohman, 511 U.S. 641 (U.S. 1994)…son concluded that this Court’s cases contained a strict rule of equality that demanded equal treatment of local and interstate commerce in each local jurisdiction, not merely in the overall result for the State. Id., at 199. We granted certiorari, 510 U. S. 1009 (1993), to consider the validity of the 1.5% use tax. II Although the Commerce Clause is phrased merely as a grant of authority to Congress to “regulate Commerce . . . among the several States,” Art. I, § 8, cl. 3, it is well established that the…