ODESSA ERHARD LYNCH
v.
JOHN HARVEY LYNCH

Fla. | 1938-10-11
Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.
134 Fla. 210 Florida Supreme Court (1938) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 184 So. 86
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the’ decree herein, and briefs and argument of .counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Kish v. State, 192 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
    …tnesses used against them, we find that no prejudice has been demonstrated under appellants’ point numbered I. See Jarvis v. State, 115 Fla. 320, 156 So. 310 (1934); Dupree v. State, 125 Fla. 58, 169 So. 600 (1936); Hendricks v. State, 134 Fla. 452, 184 So. 86 (1938); Harper v. State, 160 Fla. 402, 35 So. 2d 4 (1948). We turn now to appellants’ second point, which urges error upon the denial of appellant Kish’s motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant It must initially be pointed o…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw